Autenticidad¡?¡?¡??¡
los memes son muuuuuuyyyyyyyyy auténticos.
Partiendo de una tragedia, se esperan dos o tres tragedias más¡?¡?¡?
DESIRE SOLE
https://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/2393/3577
NOTAS Top
[1]
Luqman Rababah ([2]
Variedad de esta técnica es el método de la puntuación instantánea propuesto por Silvia, Martin y Nusbaum ([3]
Baer y McKool ([4]
Para el diseño válido y fiable de las rúbricas pueden consultarse las instrucciones dadas por Dornisch y Sabatini McLoughlin ([5]
Tales como: completo o incompleto, preciso o impreciso, lógico o ilógico, detallado, minucioso, creativo, original, sutil, sofisticado, sintético, analítico, integrador, con errores conceptuales mayores o menores, con flexibilidad o rigidez de valoración, con simplicidad o complejidad de pensamiento, perspicaz o confuso, relevante o redundante y obvio, bien documentado o no, organizado o desordenado, etc.
Top
○ Allardice, Kevin (2018). The Oaks. Mercy High School. Burlingame. Spring 2018. Disponible en: https://issuu.com/mercyhsb/docs/the_oaks_-_spring_2018 [Fecha de consulta: 23 noviembre 2019].
○ Allen, Mary J. (2014). Using Rubrics to Grade, Assess, and Improve Student Learning. Miami-Dade College. March 7, 2014. Disponible en: https://www.academia.edu/39389988/Using_Rubrics_to_Grade_Assess_and_Improve_Student_Learning [Fecha de consulta: 24 octubre 2019].
○ Arter, Judy y McTighe, Jay (2000). Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Oaks CA: Corwin Press.
○ Ashton, Scott y Davies, Randall S. (2015). Using scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC writing course. Distance Education, 36 (3), pp. 312-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1081733
○ Baer, John y McKool, Sharon S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment technique. En: Schreiner, Christopher S. (ed.). Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education. Rider University: IGI Global, pp. 65-77. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-667-9.ch004
○ Blamires, Mike y Patterson, Andrew (2014). Can Creativity be Assessed? Towards an Evidence. Informed Framework for Assessing and Planning Progress in Creativity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44 (2), pp. 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.860081
○ Blomer, Yvonne Elizabeth (2011). Assessment in creative writing. Wascana Review, 43 (1), pp. 61-73.
○ Brookhart, Susan M. (2013). How to Create and use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. Alexandria: ASCD.
○ Burke, Robert A. (2003). The Influence of Rubrics on High School Students’ Creative Writing Skills. Ohio: Defiance College. [Tesis de máster].
○ Burroway, Janet (2011). Imaginative Writing: Elements of Craft. New York: Penguin.
○ Carmines, Edward G. y Zeller, Richard A. (eds.). (2005). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
○ Carruthers, Lindsey y MacLean, Roy (2019). The dynamic definition of creativity: Implications for creativity assessment. En: Beghetto, Ronald A. y Corazza, Giovanni E. (eds.). Dynamic perspectives on creativity. New directions for theory, research, and practice in education. Springer, pp. 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_12
○ Davenport, Aneesa (2017). Assessing Creative Writing Is Hard, So Here Are Three Ways to Avoid. Putting It into Words: The Future of Writing Instruction. Oct 2, 2017. Disponible en https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-1...ng-is-hard-so-here-are-three-ways-to-avoid-it [Fecha de consulta: 23 noviembre 2019].
○ Dawson, Philip (2017). Assessment Rubrics: Towards Clearer and More Replicable Design, Research and Practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42 (3), pp. 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
○ Díaz Suárez, Saray (2015). Evaluating creative writing: the criterion behind short stories’ assessment. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. [Tesis de máter]. Disponible en https://ddd.uab.cat/record/137423
○ Dornisch, Michele M. y Sabatini McLoughlin, Andrea (2006). Limitations of web-based rubric resources: Addressing the challenges. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 11 (3), pp. 1-8.
○ Gotesky, Rubin y Breithaupt, Erwin (1978). Creativity: A Metasociological Analysis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 39 (1), pp. 23-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107028
○ Graham, Steve; Hebert, Michael y Harris, Karen R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115 (4), pp. 523-547. https://doi.org/10.1086/681947
○ Griffin, Patrick y Phan Nguyet, Anh (2005). Assessment of creative writing in Vietnamese primary education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6 (1), pp. 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024969
○ Harper, Graeme (2016). Teaching Creative Writing. En: Jones, Rodney H. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Creativity. New York: Routledge, pp. 498-512.
○ Holland, Siobman; Butt, Maggie; Harper, Graeme y Wandor, Michele (2003). Creative writing: A good practice guide. English Subject Centre. Report series, 6. Disponible en http://english.heacademy.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/cwguide.pdf [Fecha de consulta: 23 noviembre 2019].
○ Huerta, Margarita; Lara-Aleci, Rafael; Tong, Fuhui e Irby, Beverly J. (2014). Developing and Validating a Science Notebook Rubric for Fifth-Grade Non-Mainstream Students. International Journal of Science Education, 36 (11), pp. 1849-1870. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.879623
○ Joseph, Sue A.; Rickett, Carolyn; Northcote, Maria y Christian, Beverly. J. (2020). Who are you to judge my writing?’: Student collaboration in the co-construction of assessment rubrics. New Writing, 17 (1), pp. 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2019.1566368
○ Kaufman, James C. y Baer, John (2012). Beyond new and appropriate. Who decides what is creative?. Creativity Research Journal, 24 (1), pp. 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.649237
○ Kaufman, James. C.; Baer, John y Cole, Jason. C. (2009). Expertise, domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43 (4), pp. 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.x
○ Kozbelt, Aaron; Beghetto, Ronald. A. y Runco, Mark A. (2010). Theories of creativity. En: Kaufman, James C. y Sternberg, Robert J. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 20-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.004
○ Kroll, Jeri (1997). A or C: Can we assess creative work fairly?. Disponible en https://dspace2.flinders.edu.au/xmlui/handle/2328/15073 [Fecha de consulta: 4 septiembre 2019].
○ Luft, Julie (1997). Design your own rubric. Science Scope, 20, pp. 25-27.
○ MacKinnon, Maria Moira (2001). Using observational feedback to promote academic development. The International Journal for Academic Development, 6, pp. 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440110033689
○ Miller, Michael D.; Linn, Robert L. y Gronlund, Norman E. (2013). Measurement and assessment in teaching. New Jersey: Pearson.
○ Mills, Paul (2006). The Routledge Creative Writing Course Book. New York: Routledge.
○ Morris, Gerard y Sharplin, Elaine (2013). The Assessment of Creative Writing. English in Education, 47 (1), pp. 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12004
○ Moskal, Barbara M. y Leydens, Jon A. (2000). Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7 (10), pp. 71-81.
○ Mozaffari, Hamideh (2013). An Analytical Rubric for Assessing Creativity in Creative Writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3 (12), pp. 2214-2219. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2214-2219
○ Newman, Jenny (2007). The Evaluation of Creative Writing at M.A. Level (UK). En: Earnshaw, Steven (ed.). The Handbook of Teaching Creative Writing. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press, pp. 24-36.
○ Nezakatgoo, Behzad (2011). Portfolio as a viable alternative in writing assessment. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2 (4), pp. 747-756. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.4.747-756
○ Perry, Tonya (2004). The Art of Grading Papers Quickly and Effectively. English Journal, 94 (1), pp. 115-119. https://doi.org/10.2307/4128859
○ Peters, Cheryl (1990). Applause, applause: Evaluating creative response and projects. Annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Atlanta, GA, Novembre 16-21, 1990.
○ Price, Kevin (2019). The writing teacher: rethinking assessment and transformative learning in the creative writing classroom. New Writing. The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 17 (4), pp. 463-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2019.1699577
○ Rababah, Luqman (2018). An adapted version of Torrance test of creative thinking (TTCT) in EFL/ESL writing: a rubric scoring and a review of studies. International Journal of English and Education, 7 (2), pp. 128-136.
○ Rensahw, Jason (2010). How do we grade creative writing?. Learning Twigs. Disponible en https://jasonrenshaw.typepad.com/ja...2010/04/how-do-we-grade-creative-writing.html [Fecha de consulta 24 octubre 2019].
○ Rezaei, Ali Reza y Lovorn, Michael (2010). Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assessing writing, 15 (1), pp. 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.003
○ Rochford, Linda y Borchert, Patricia S. (2011). Assessing Higher Level Learning: Developing Rubrics for Case Analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 86 (5), pp. 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2010.512319
○ Rodríguez, Alicia (2008). The ‘Problem’ of Creative Writing: Using Grading Rubrics Based on Narrative Theory as Solution. New Writing. The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 5 (3), pp. 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790720802209963
○ Rodríguez Romero, Olga Neida (2018). Assessing through rubrics; an effective tool to improve writing in upper secondary students. Piura, Perú: Universidad de Piura. [Tesis de máster]. Disponible en https://pirhua.udep.edu.pe/handle/11042/3757
○ Silvia, Paul J.; Martin, Christopher y Nusbaum, Emily C. (2009). A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4 (2), pp. 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.005
○ Somasundaran, Swapna; Flor, Michael; Chodorow, Martin; Molloy, Hillary; Gyawalli, Binod y McCulla, Laura (2018). Towards Evaluating Narrative Quality. Student Writing. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, pp. 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00007
○ Taylor, Craig y Burke da Silva, Karen (2014). An analysis of the effectiveness of feedback to students on assessed work. Higher Education Research and Development, 33 (4), pp. 794-806. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863840
○ Timmerman, Briana Crotwell; Strickland, Denise; Johnson, Robert L. y Payne, John R. (2011). Development of a ‘universal’ rubric for assessing undergraduates' scientific reasoning skills using scientific writing. Assessment y Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (5), pp. 509-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903540991
○ Tung, Chan Kwong (2015). Assessment of Creative Writing: The Case of Singapore Secondary Chinese Language Curriculum. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3 (10), pp. 655-662. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.031001
○ Vaezi, Maryam y Rezaei, Saeed (2019). Development of a rubric for evaluating creative writing: a multi-phase research. New Writing. The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 16 (3), pp. 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2018.1520894
○ Weigle, Sara Cushing (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997